Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 15:03
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Fiserv’s stock surges as it teams with Circle to join the stablecoin party - MarketWatch
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Kirk Cousins spoke to the media — Here are 5 things we learned - Atlanta Falcons
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Where you live may affect your risk of dementia, UCSF study finds - San Francisco Chronicle
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
What can you do if someone makes a false accusation against you?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
In bed, not in music, which is better, a drummer or a bass player?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why did my bipolar girlfriend split up with me?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The U.S. hasn’t seen a new confirmed human bird flu case in nearly 4 months — why? - Yahoo